The Ultimate Printing Comparison
DTF vs Sublimation vs DTG vs Screen Printing — 2026 Edition
DTF vs Sublimation vs DTG vs Screen Printing
The Technical Comparison No One Else Will Give You
Quick Verdict
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | DTF | Sublimation | DTG | Screen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabric Range | ✅ Any fabric | ⚠️ Polyester only | ⚠️ Cotton focus | ✅ Most fabrics |
| Dark Garments | ✅ Full color | ❌ Not possible | ✅ With pretreat | ✅ With underbase |
| Hand Feel | Medium (raised) | Zero texture ★ | Softest ★ | Varies by ink |
| Durability | 50+ washes | Lifetime ★ | 20-30 washes | Outlasts garment ★ |
| Cost (1-10 units) | $0.50–$1.80 ★ | $0.30–$1.00 ★ | $1.50–$4.00 | $5.00+ (setup) |
| Cost (100+ units) | $0.50–$1.50 | $0.30–$0.80 | $1.50–$3.00 | $0.50–$2.00 ★ |
| Setup Time | 15 min | 10 min | 20 min + pretreat | 1+ hour (screens) |
| Pre-treatment | ❌ None needed | ❌ None | ✅ Required (dark) | ❌ None |
| Color Limit | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited | Per-screen cost |
| Min Order | 1 unit | 1 unit | 1 unit | 50-100+ practical |
| Startup Cost | $2,400–$6,000 | $500–$3,000 | $5,000–$20,000 | $2,000–$15,000 |
| Pre-print Inventory | ✅ Gang sheets | ❌ Print-to-press | ❌ Per-garment | ❌ Per-garment |
Deep Dive: How Each Method Works
🎨 Direct-to-Film (DTF)
How It Works
- 1.Design printed onto PET film with CMYK + White inks
- 2.Hot-melt TPU adhesive powder applied to wet ink
- 3.Film cured in oven to melt powder into adhesive layer
- 4.Transfer heat-pressed onto garment (305°F / 150°C, 15 sec)
- 5.Film peeled away leaving durable design on fabric
Quick Stats
✅ Best For
- •Any fabric type (cotton, polyester, nylon, blends, leather)
- •Small-to-medium volume (1-500 units)
- •Dark and light garments equally
- •Pre-printed transfer inventory ("gang sheets")
- •Transfer-as-a-Service B2B revenue
⚠️ Limitations
- •Slightly raised texture vs. DTG or sublimation
- •White ink maintenance (TiO₂ sedimentation)
- •Requires environmental control (40-60% RH)
- •PET film waste (not yet widely recyclable)
2026 Trend: Powderless DTF
Should You Go Powderless?
Powderless Benefits
- No shaker unit — ~40% smaller equipment footprint
- No airborne TPU powder particulates (health benefit)
- Simpler workflow — print → cure → press
- Reduced mechanical failure (shaker jams eliminated)
Powderless Drawbacks (2026)
- Stiffer prints — worse hand feel than standard DTF
- Proprietary consumables — cannot use third-party inks
- Higher cost per print — 30-50% more than commoditized powder/ink
- Immature chemistry — durability not yet proven to 50+ washes
The Hybrid Shop: UV DTF Integration
The "apparel printing" opportunity extends beyond textiles. UV DTF uses ultraviolet light (instead of heat) to cure ink onto film with a pressure-sensitive adhesive, creating "peel-and-stick" transfers for hard surfaces — glass, metal, ceramic, plastic.
Same Workflow
Both textile DTF and UV DTF use similar RIP software (e.g., CADlink Digital Factory). Staff training transfers between both systems with minimal overhead.
Cross-Sell Revenue
Corporate clients want both uniforms (textile DTF) and promotional items (mugs, pens, awards). Serving both from one shop captures the full branding budget.
Competitive Moat
Most DTF shops only do textiles. A hybrid textile + hard goods shop eliminates the need for clients to find a second vendor — a formidable competitive advantage.
When to add UV DTF: If more than 15% of your clients request hard goods (mugs, promotional items), a UV DTF printer pays for itself by capturing revenue you'd otherwise lose to competitors.→ Read our eufy E1 UV Printer Review
Environmental Sustainability in 2026
| Factor | DTF | Sublimation | DTG | Screen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water Usage | Minimal | Minimal | Minimal | High (screen reclaiming) |
| Waste Material | PET film (not widely recyclable) | Transfer paper (recyclable) | Minimal | Chemical waste, screens |
| VOC Emissions | TPU powder curing (caprolactam) | Low | Low (water-based) | Solvent inks possible |
| Eco Inks Available | OEKO-TEX certified | Yes | Water-based standard | Water-based options |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about apparel printing methods
DTF and sublimation serve different needs. DTF works on any fabric type (cotton, polyester, nylon, blends) and prints on dark garments, while sublimation only works on polyester or polymer-coated surfaces and light colors. DTF has a slightly raised texture, while sublimation has zero texture (dye becomes part of the fiber). For a business serving diverse clients, DTF is more versatile. For polyester sportswear exclusively, sublimation produces a superior, no-texture finish.
For small runs (1-50 units), DTF is cheapest at $0.50-$1.80 per print (materials only). Sublimation is comparable at $0.30-$1.00 but only works on polyester. For large runs (100+ identical units), screen printing becomes cheapest at $0.50-$2.00 per unit once setup costs are amortized. DTG is the most expensive per unit at $1.50-$4.00 but offers the softest hand feel on cotton.
Sublimation prints on polyester last the longest — essentially the lifetime of the garment — because the dye is chemically embedded into the fibers. Screen printing on cotton is next, often outlasting the garment itself. DTF prints survive 50+ washes without cracking because the TPU resin encapsulates the ink. DTG prints typically show visible fading after 20-30 washes due to cotton fiber fibrillation — the fibers themselves fray and carry the ink with them. All methods far exceed heat transfer vinyl in durability.
No. Sublimation printing does not use white ink, so it cannot print on dark-colored fabrics. The dye-sublimation process relies on the garment's light/white base color to show through the transparent sublimation inks. For dark garments, DTF or DTG (with white pretreatment) are the appropriate technologies. This is a fundamental limitation of sublimation chemistry that cannot be overcome.
Powderless DTF systems integrate adhesive properties into the ink chemistry instead of using separate TPU powder. Benefits include no shaker unit (40% smaller footprint) and no airborne powder particulates. However, in 2026, powderless formulations often produce stiffer prints with worse hand feel, use proprietary (expensive) consumables, and are not yet mature enough for primary production. Standard powdered DTF with proper filtration remains the lower-risk, higher-margin path for business use.
UV DTF uses ultraviolet light (instead of heat) to cure ink onto a film with a pressure-sensitive adhesive. The result is a 'peel-and-stick' transfer for rigid/hard surfaces like glass, metal, ceramic, and plastic — materials that cannot go through a heat press. Regular textile DTF uses heat-activated TPU powder to bond to fabrics. Both use similar RIP software (like CADlink Digital Factory), so a hybrid shop can cross-sell textile and hard goods decoration with minimal additional training.